9/10ECOM - Meet and Greet
ECOM - Meet and GreetThursday, September 10th, 202012:15 PM - 01:30 PMStorrs CampusWebEx
Please send an email to "email@example.com" for the WebEx link.Contact Information: firstname.lastname@example.org More
9/25CogSci Colloquium: Iris Berent
CogSci Colloquium: Iris BerentFriday, September 25th, 202004:00 PM - 06:00 PMStorrs CampusZoom: https://zoom.us/j/95285812000?pwd=L2NFbFNuamVxNFlGSXF5T0N1bFc3QT09
Professor in the Department of Psychology at Northeastern University
Friday, September 25th, 4pm, virtually via Zoom
Meeting ID: 952 8581 2000
Dr. Berent will provide a talk entitled "How we reason about innateness"
Abstract: Few questions in science are as controversial as the origins of knowledge. Whether ideas (propositional attitudes, e.g., “objects are cohesive”) are innate or acquired has been debated for centuries. Here, I ask whether our difficulties with innate ideas could be grounded in human cognition itself.
I first demonstrate that people are systematically biased against the possibility that ideas are innate. They consider epistemic traits (specifically, ideas, as opposed to horizontal faculties, such as attention) as less likely to be innate compared to non-epistemic traits (sensorimotor or emotive)— those of humans, birds and aliens, and they maintain this belief despite explicit evidence suggesting that the traits in question are in fact innate.
I next move to trace this bias to the collision between two principles of core cognition—Dualism and Essentialism. Dualism (Bloom, 2004) renders ideas immaterial; per Essentialism, the innate essence of living things must be material (Newman & Keil, 2008). It thus follows that epistemic traits cannot be innate. A second series of experiments tests these predictions.
These results show for the first time that people are selectively biased in reasoning about the origins of innate ideas. While these findings from adults cannot ascertain the origins of these biases, they do open up the possibility that our resistance to innate ideas could be in our nature.
I conclude by briefly considering how the dissonance between Dualism and Essentialism can further account for a wide range of other phenomena, from why we are seduced by neuroscience to why we fear the takeover of humanity by AI, and what we think happens when we die.
Please join Iris for a virtual happy hour (open to all) @ 6 PM via Zoom: https://zoom.us/j/8587400098?pwd=YmszU2h2UmxNZGJpM1ZMMGZ2c1cvQT09
Open meeting w/ all graduate students @1:30 - 2:00 PM via Zoom: https://zoom.us/j/8587400098?pwd=YmszU2h2UmxNZGJpM1ZMMGZ2c1cvQT09Contact Information: email@example.com More
9/30Psychology Colloquium: Dr. Stuart Vyse
Psychology Colloquium: Dr. Stuart VyseWednesday, September 30th, 202003:30 PM - 05:00 PMStorrs CampusZoom meeting
Event address for attendees:
Meeting ID: 688 489 9144
Passcode: 2020Contact Information: Shu Jiang firstname.lastname@example.org More